Optical strain gauges are strain sensors based on optical fibers. There are several optical technologies that fit the same classification, but this article focuses on Fiber Bragg Grating (FBG) based sensors – a technology embraced by HBK. FBGs are primarily used to measure strain, but can easily be integrated into different types of transducers, such as temperature, acceleration or displacement transducers.
Compared to traditional electrical strain gauges, optical strain gauges do not need electricity. Instead, the technology is based on light that propagates through a fiber. The sensors are, therefore, completely passive and immune, for example, to electromagnetic interference. This is just one of the reasons why optical strain gauges are superior to electrical ones in certain applications.
“One Fiber Bragg Grating as a whole is approximately 5 millimetres long, though the individual material interferences cannot be seen with the naked eye, only under a microscope,” explains Cristina Barbosa. Many Fiber Bragg Gratings can be inscribed in one long fiber – each working as an individual strain sensor.
When the optical fiber is applied to a material, it will be strained along with this material. The measured strain will in turn allow an analysis of the mechanical stress in the material, which is the aim of most strain measurements.
To give a practical example, when the fiber is applied to the girders of a long bridge, it is strained when there is stress in the girder elements. This can be, for example, due to the vibration of vehicles rushing by. When the structure settles or even develops weak points or cracks over the years, this becomes visible from the information about strain and thus mechanical stress acquired by the sensors – a useful early indication as to where maintenance is needed.
For measurements, the optical fiber needs to be connected to a so-called interrogator; it continuously sends out light in different wavelengths, one at a time, thus covering a wide spectrum. This is called “sweeping laser”. Light propagates through the fiber, is reflected at some point by a FBG and returns to the interrogator.
Thanks to the different periods of individual FBGs, it is possible to distinguish between the signals of different sensors. The rest of the light is refracted when reaching the end of the fiber so that it doesn’t interfere with the measurement. The actual strain and, in turn, the material stress can be deduced from the raw light signals, which return from the FBGs.
While there are different methods of measuring strain with different kinds of fiber optic sensors, what they all have in common is that they rely in some way on the properties of light.
Fiber Bragg Grating based optical fiber sensors are extremely susceptible to temperature. Obviously, the fiber − as any other material − expands when the temperature rises and contracts when the temperature drops. The refractive index changes as well. Without compensation, this would lead to the measurement of strain that has not been caused by material stress, but by temperature variations. There are several techniques for compensation, including:
“As part of the ITER project in France, our sensors need to cope with a huge temperature range starting from approximately −270°C up to 300°C while under the influence of intense electromagnetic fields. This is something that no electrical strain gauge could manage,” says Cristina Barbosa, describing one of her favourite applications for optical strain sensors.
Less exotic applications can be found, for example, in structural health or infrastructure monitoring. As a single fiber can accommodate many sensors, optical technology offers itself as a solution to huge projects such as tunnel or pipeline monitoring. Several fibers can be connected to a single optical interrogator, and cabling and installation costs are lower in comparison to traditional strain gauges.
Moreover, optical measurement technology is the first choice for all applications where the electricity needed for traditional strain gauges would be a problem, including environments with a lot of electromagnetic interference (for example, space) or where there’s a high danger of explosion (for example, oil refineries). In Cristina Barbosa’s words: