arrow_back_ios

Main Menu

See All Software See All Instruments See All Transducers See All Vibration Testing Equipment See All Electroacoustics See All Acoustic End-of-Line Test Systems See All Academy See All Resource Center See All Applications See All Industries See All Services See All Support See All Our Business See All Our History See All Global Presence
arrow_back_ios

Main Menu

See All Analysis & Simulation Software See All DAQ Software See All Drivers & API See All Utility See All Vibration Control See All High Precision and Calibration Systems See All DAQ Systems See All S&V Hand-held Devices See All Industrial Electronics See All Power Analyzer See All S&V Signal Conditioner See All Acoustic Transducers See All Current and Voltage Sensors See All Displacement Sensors See All Force Sensors See All Load Cells See All Multi Component Sensors See All Pressure Sensors See All Strain Sensors See All Strain Gauges See All Temperature Sensors See All Tilt Sensors See All Torque Sensors See All Vibration See All Accessories for Vibration Testing Equipment See All Vibration Controllers See All Measurement Exciters See All Modal Exciters See All Power Amplifiers See All LDS Shaker Systems See All Test Solutions See All Actuators See All Combustion Engines See All Durability See All eDrive See All Production Testing Sensors See All Transmission & Gearboxes See All Turbo Charger See All Training Courses See All Acoustics See All Asset & Process Monitoring See All Custom Sensors See All Durability & Fatigue See All Electric Power Testing See All NVH See All Reliability See All Vibration See All Weighing See All Automotive & Ground Transportation See All Calibration See All Installation, Maintenance & Repair See All Support Brüel & Kjær See All Release Notes See All Compliance
arrow_back_ios

Main Menu

See All nCode - Durability and Fatigue Analysis See All ReliaSoft - Reliability Analysis and Management See All API See All Experimental Testing See All Electroacoustics See All Noise Source Identification See All Environmental Noise See All Sound Power and Sound Pressure See All Noise Certification See All Industrial Process Control See All Structural Health Monitoring See All Electrical Devices Testing See All Electrical Systems Testing See All Grid Testing See All High-Voltage Testing See All Vibration Testing with Electrodynamic Shakers See All Structural Dynamics See All Machine Analysis and Diagnostics See All Dynamic Weighing See All Vehicle Electrification See All Calibration Services for Transducers See All Calibration Services for Handheld Instruments See All Calibration Services for Instruments & DAQ See All On-Site Calibration See All Resources See All Software License Management

One of the key issues in robotics is coordinating data so control functions work effectively. At HBK, our expertise lies in sensors that measure torque, force, mass, and pressure. But we also know that other data dimensions are involved: acceleration, contact, distance, gyroscope, humidity, inertia, light, navigation, position, pressure, proximity, sound, temperature, tilt, voltage – and more. 

The Challenge

Why do we have robots? A lot of good reasons spring to mind. They can be grouped around activities, environments, productivity, and economics.

Some activities are repetitive and boring. Tightening the wheel nuts may well be an essential step on a car production line, but its not an activity that can be classified as a “fulfilling career option”. At the other end of the scale, there are activities that are complex and difficult. But add the element of repetition back in, and the frustration returns. How much better to delegate repetitive tasks such as machining and milling to CNC machines and set the human imagination free to experiment with new ideas.

There are many work environments that people find unpleasant. Places where there is too much heat or cold, humidity or aridity, noise or vibration, for example. Some environments pose an inherent health risk: paint booths, nuclear reactors, volcanoes, polar regions. 

And then there are work environments that are downright dangerous: mines, deep sea operations, higher altitudes, outer space. Instead of risking life and limb, we can build robots to handle such environments.

Productivity is a great reason for having robots. Machines can perform work faster, more accurately, with greater consistency than humans. And they require less downtime. Taken collectively, these ideas add up to a strong economic argument for robots. Robots that do work that people don’t want to do, and produce greater value than the costs of ownership and operation, are a benefit to society.

There is one other reason why we have robots: human curiosity. The simple fact is, some people get an enormous kick out of designing elegant solutions to sophisticated problems.

chevron_left
chevron_right

Robots as we know them today are a combination of computer science and engineering. Sensors gather data about the environment; a controlling program determines how and when the robot will act; actuators implement the action; sensors gather data about the interaction and provide feedback to the controlling programme, Repeat infinitely, in real time.

That simple phrase – ‘sensors gather data’ - hides enormous complexity. Each sensor must observe the signals it was designed for, reliably and accurately. But control algorithms are seldom about just one piece of data - multiple signals must be transformed into actionable data and forwarded to the controller. At HBK, our expertise lies in sensors that measure torque, force, mass, pressure. But we also know that other data dimensions are involved: acceleration, contact, distance, gyroscope, humidity, inertia, light, navigation, position, pressure, proximity, sound, temperature, tilt, voltage – and more. One of the key issues in robotics is co-ordinating data so that control functions work effectively.

The issue of sensing and programming becomes more complex the moment humans come near. The idea of a robot as a helper – a Co-Bot (collaborative robot) - introduces additional safety parameters. Robots must not move with a torque that would injure a person, so sensors must react faster, actuators must decelerate more quickly. These aspects, too, have been discussed and agreed internationally: IEEE as well as ISO have issued standards.

The issues become even more complex when the autonomous robot – controlled by an Artifial Intelligence (AI) program - ventures into public life. For although it must act independently of its programmers, the robot may in practice inherit assumptions and biases that reflect the programming teams’ definition of ‘normal’, ‘acceptable’ or ‘desirable’ decisions. Leading institutions such as the IEEE, as well as universities like Stanford and MIT, now recognise ‘Robot Ethics’ as an important field.

oem sensors - key-visual-3D-artwork_isolated

For all their sophistication, static production line robots are conceptually ‘simple’. They typically perform one specific function: for example: cut, press, weld, or paint. The individual robot does not know the function it performs; nor the process that precedes or follows it; much less the concept of teamwork.

The real intelligence lies in defining the sequence of robotic actions, which is provided by human experts. And ‘finding a better solution’ is an innately human activity. The search for a more effective conceptual model for a robot is a fundamental issue. It impacts not just robot design but also practical operation. Interestingly, many models come from nature.

Behaviours observed among insects, for example, contribute to the controls for fetch-and-carry warehouse robots. Each individual robot follows simple rules to ensure it achieves its mission without getting in anothers’ way. The more sophisticated conceptual models use insights from observing swarms in nature – of insects, birds or fish – to enable individual robots to share information and co-ordinate their actions, for increased effectiveness.

The market potential for production line robots is constantly expanding. Robots that move stock around the factory floor are mainstream. In the search for increased efficiency, some vendors provide the ability to climb the shelves when picking stock; other have re-designed both the storage system and the robot that accesses it, to optimise use of warehouse space.

Follower robots can carry heavy loads (like burro for farmers, or gita for city dwellers). Autonomous robots are gaining traction – both on private industrial premises (like factories or mines or for cleaning warehouses) as well as public spaces, for activities such as delivery services. Meantime, other concepts have appeared and created additional opportunities such as mobile robots, aerial robots and soft robots. 

Will robots transform the world of work? They already have. Many activities that were repetitive, boring, uncomfortable or downright dangerous are already handled by robots. Meantime, human resources have been freed up, enabling people to do what they do best: create sophisticated and innovative solutions to challenging problems. It looks like that trend is set to continue. If we can increase productivity and bring about a more even distribution of wealth both within and between the different societies across the globe, a world with robots can definitely be a better place.

 

 

Related Pages