Main Menu

See All ソフトウェア See All 計測器 See All トランスデューサ See All 振動試験装置 See All 電気音響 See All 音響エンドオブライン試験システム See All アプリケーション See All インダストリーズ See All キャリブレーション See All エンジニアリングサービス See All サポート

Main Menu

See All 解析シミュレーション See All DAQ See All APIドライバ See All ユーティリティ See All 振動コントロール See All 校正 See All DAQ See All ハンドヘルド See All 産業 See All パワーアナライザ See All シグナルコンディショナー See All 音響 See All 電流電圧 See All 変位 See All 力 See All ロードセル See All マルチコンポーネント See All 圧力 See All ひずみ See All ひずみゲージ See All 温度 See All チルト See All トルク See All 振動 See All アクセサリ See All コントローラ See All 測定加振器 See All モーダル加振器 See All パワーアンプ See All 加振器システム See All テストソリューション See All アクチュエータ See All 内燃機関 See All 耐久性 See All eDrive See All 生産テストセンサ See All トランスミッションギアボックス See All ターボチャージャ See All アコースティック See All アセット&プロセスモニタリング See All 電力 See All NVH See All OEMカスタムセンサ See All 構造的な整合性 See All 振動: See All 自動車・陸上輸送 See All 圧力校正|センサー|振動子 See All 校正・修理のご依頼 See All キャリブレーションとベリフィケーション See All キャリブレーション・プラス契約 See All サポート ブリュエル・ケアー

Main Menu

See All nCode - 耐久性および疲労解析 See All ReliaSoft - 信頼性解析と管理 See All API See All 電気音響 See All 環境ノイズ See All 騒音源の特定 See All 製品ノイズ See All 音響パワーと音圧 See All 自動車通過騒音 See All 生産テストと品質保証 See All 機械分析・診断 See All 構造物ヘルスモニタリング See All バッテリーテスト See All 過渡現象時の電力測定入門 See All トランスの等価回路図|HBM See All アグリ業界向けOEMセンサー See All ロボティクスとトルクアプリケーション用OEMセンサー See All 構造ダイナミクス See All 材料特性試験 See All pages-not-migrated See All ソフトウェアライセンス管理

The Case for Generic FMEAs and Strategies for using them in XFMEA

As product development to market times continue to shrink, the amount of allowable time to perform efficient FMEAs and follow best practices for design review similarly is reduced. One strategy for maximizing effective use of time and efforts is to intelligently and appropriately reuse FMEA and system configuration information from previous generations or platform siblings. This article discusses several ways that you can use ReliaSoft XFMEA to manage and use various approaches for storing and reusing your FMEA data.



Generic FMEAs take many forms and approaches. Choosing the method that is best for you requires understanding the strengths and risks for each approach. Among the many ways they can be used, one common method is to continuously update partially filled out FMEAs with captured lessons learned from previous analyses. This approach is typically used to populate lists of common FMEA definitions (functions, failure modes, effects, etc.), or can be used to represent common piece parts in systems. This is most effective where we can safely assume that these parts are functionally identical wherever they are implemented.


Other methods allow you to recreate, or selectively manage and reuse not only FMEA elements, but also portions of or the entire system hierarchy/BOM structure. Others allow you to manage and reuse only the elements that are appropriate for the next generation of your design. And yet others give you centralized control and management of common equipment to a single instance that you can reuse in many different areas or projects.


With any approach where you are reusing previous assumptions and information, your team should have a standardized approach for assessing the appropriateness for reuse, and then for reviewing the reused material with a set of questions and common concerns.

Figure 1. Smart Add Example

Smart Add


Using the Smart Add feature within XFMEA allows you to build system hierarchies and FMEAs from prior projects of preconfigured structures. Effectively this means that XFMEA can identify common structures and associations from existing analyses. Additionally, the Smart Add feature enables you to easily apply FMEA elements into your analysis based upon identifiers matched to previous projects.

In this manner you can rebuild portions of a hierarchy, either mirroring previous configurations or building a hierarchy via a more modular approach if many similar configurations have been introduced or set up. Once you establish the hierarchy, you can continue to use the Smart Add features to bring in FMEA elements (functions, failure modes, effects, etc.) based upon prior use and matching identifiers as appropriate. Figure 1 shows how you can import failure descriptions that match the specified criteria.

One of the primary strengths of this approach is that you can see all possible previously used or configured options, and then select the ones that are most appropriate for the current design. Since you can select and add many options at once, this can significantly speed up the pre-population step for FMEA preparation/facilitation.

Reference projects


The ability to link and manage FMEA analyses from reference projects allows companies with multiple design FMEAs of similar systems to control common subsystem and component level FMEAs from one centralized location. You can then reuse these FMEAs in as many active projects as necessary. Additionally, you can use this approach of defining once and reusing in many places in other approaches where you can assemble FMEAs in a much more modular or process-driven environment.

When linking from a reference project, the entire common FMEA is re-used in the new location, and you can also add unique local FMEAs for any applications or functions that vary from the common FMEA. Due to the limitation of reusing each analysis in whole, you need to strategically approach how you structure these analyses. There are two primary methods for doing this.

  1. Define the generic function-failure-effect-cause-control chains so as to only capture those functions and following definitions that can apply across the intended range of reuse.
  2. Break down function-chains into a much more modular approach, where you have multiple analyses to pull from to assemble any given FMEA. For example, you could break them down where one level contains common design requirements, and then have different platform applications based on usage criteria, material specifications, environmental considerations or adherence to specific standards.

Either of these approaches will still require evaluation from the team post-assembly or reuse to consider whether there are additional FMEA records that the team is required to address or where concerns remain. In this case, XFMEA offers multiple methods of resolution. You can add a local analysis to the item where you have the FMEA. This method allows the team to define additional concerns while still maintaining an active link to the reference project source. Alternatively, the team can break the link to the originating reference material, thus allowing the team to modify the information as they would any other standard FMEA approach. Figure 2 shows an item with both a local FMEA and a linked FMEA from a reference project.

Figure 2. Item with Local FMEA and Reference FMEA

As stated above, there are many methods that you can follow to appropriately reuse information to help guide your FMEA process and allow your team to focus on where the identified risk is and, with minimal vetting effort, help to develop a strategy for a design process that continuously improves itself with every new generation of FMEA.

Restore points


The concept behind using restore points is to reduce your system configuration, and each FMEA within your system, down to the basic requirements and common approaches, and then use that as your starting point for your next revision. This requires maintaining and updating the baseline after each completed FMEA. However, it also has the strength of completely carrying over your system configuration (BOM) as well as common requirements, functions, failure modes and beyond.

Import methods


There are a myriad of ways to import information into XFMEA to reuse, or utilize information that is either inside the repository, coming from another ReliaSoft software product, or from external sources. In this way you can use existing Excel documents, prior XFMEA projects or external databases as potential starting points. The internal reuse from within XFMEA grants you the most flexibility, with methods to pull in selected hierarchy items and/or portions of, or entire FMEA analyses, along with filtering criteria, and search features. Additionally, you can import the BOM and reliability data from a prediction completed in ReliaSoft Lambda Predict or build from the systems that are represented in ReliaSoft XFRACAS. Figure 3 shows two ways of importing data from other projects from within XFMEA.

Figure 3. Import Examples

As stated above, there are many methods that you can follow to appropriately reuse information to help guide your FMEA process and allow your team to focus on where the identified risk is and, with minimal vetting effort, help to develop a strategy for a design process that continuously improves itself with every new generation of FMEA.