nCode DesignLife in the development process
The objective of a fatigue life investigation is to evaluate the fatigue strength of parts or components. If a calculation shows that the fatigue strength cannot be ensured, the geometry of the part has to be modified until it meets the criteria. A typical investigation consists of loading results (stresses) from a finite element analysis (i.e. from Abaqus or Nastran), applying certain load conditions, and performing the fatigue analysis itself (with Dang Van criterion or other). The results, such as contour plots of danger factors, are then displayed. The results of the fatigue analysis are written into a file that can be reloaded into PSA’s standard post-processing software, HyperView from Altair Engineering.
The following example showcases a fatigue evaluation of an engine cradle. A finite element analysis has been performed with Abaqus. Several loads case describing a loading cycle on the cradle have been applied. In the next step, the finite element results are loaded into nCode DesignLife (via the FE Input Glyph) and have been sent to the fatigue analysis Glyph (Dang Van). The user then defines the material parameters according to the Dang Van criterion (parameters HSS and TAFE) and the results are displayed on a FE Display Glyph and written to a file. This analysis can be performed on both the metal sheets (Fig. 3) and the spot welds (Fig. 4).
To handle spot welds (ESW), HBM Prenscia implemented a specific treatment in the Dang Van Glyph as requested by PSA. This customized development step enables PSA to perform the same type of calculation as with PSA-Fatig. The FE model of the ESWs uses beams, and in this case, the input data to
nCode DesignLife (FE input Glyph) are the forces expressed on the nodes of the beams. The specific treatment implemented in
nCode DesignLife allows these forces to be converted into stresses around the ESW, and then the Dang Van criterion can be calculated.